Fatcow Icon
EPA Fines Still A Possibility
by Frank Lewis
Mar 31, 2010 | 1901 views | 4 4 comments | 19 19 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The city of Portsmouth may eventually be fined hundreds of thousands of dollars if it does not comply with the classification requirements at its Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responding to the inquiry — “Why is the EPA not doing anything (as far as enforcement actions) if the city has been out of compliance for so long?”

EPA responded, “Ohio EPA acknowledges the frustrations of the community. Respectfully, our Agency does not agree with the assessment that Ohio EPA ‘isn’t doing anything.’ Ohio EPA has discretion when it comes to enforcement. Since the Agency’s first goal is always compliance, our staff works closely with facilities and municipalities to help them comply with the terms of their permits and with state and federal rules and regulations. Often, compliance can be achieved by utilizing a cooperative approach, but if need be, Ohio EPA always has the option of going the more lengthy legal route of formal enforcement referrals (which sometimes involve the Ohio Attorney General and sometimes result in civil penalties). There are different types of “enforcement.” Ohio EPA considers notice of violation (NOV) letters to be one type of enforcement action. Ohio EPA just sent the city of Portsmouth one such NOV last week…”

The response goes on to say, “Typically, administrative violations don’t trigger escalated enforcement action unless there are many such violations or if the administrative violations are accompanied by multiple or severe effluent (discharge) violations (i.e. water pollution). Ohio EPA recognizes that Portsmouth is showing signs of progress in returning to compliance (i.e. operator requirements). Still, Ohio EPA staff continue to press the city toward attaining and maintaining full compliance.”

In a letter to Portsmouth Mayor Jane Murray, Michael Yandrich, district representative, Division of Surface Water, said on Feb. 17, he and Scott Foster conducted a compliance inspection at the city of Portsmouth’s Lawson Run Wastewater Treatment Plant. At that inspection, Yandrich said Ernie Stickler, Tommy Stewart and Jeff Peck represented the city and accompanied them through the plant and lab as they evaluated the Lawson Run Wastewater Treatment Plant’s compliance with the Ohio Water Pollution Control Act.

Yandrich said during the inspection several violations were noted including a violation dealing with the need for a Class 4 operator on duty 40 hours and five days a week; since the firing of Rick Duncan as the director of the Wastewater Plant, that facility has been out of compliance.

“The lack of citation of this violation was an oversight during previous inspections,” the letter said.

The letter also notes that the city should aggressively continue to pursue the hiring of a Class 4 operator for the plant, and warns — “Continued violations may result in penalties of up to $10,000 per violation per day.”

“We actually have three qualified Class 4 operators, two of them we have interviewed,” Peck said Tuesday when asked about progress being made to deal with the staffing problem. “We also have an employee at the Sciotoville plant that is a Class 3 operator, and has submitted his paperwork to sit for the Class 4. This would put him at the same as Rick Duncan.”

Duncan was a Class 3 operator as director of the facility, and was granted an exemption pending his working toward his Class 4 certification.

Another issue deals with the Sanitary Sewer Overflows, which the report says continue to be reported and observed at the Munns Run pump station. The permit specifically prohibits SSOs, and again the statement carries a warning of possible penalties of up to $10,000 per violation per day.

Other problems involved the back-up power supply, sampling, and issues such as lab thermometers being out of calibration by at least one year, as well as several other recommendations that needed to be complied with.

FRANK LEWIS can be reached at (740) 353-3101, ext. 232 or flewis@heartlandpublications.com
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Meshellnurse38@Verizon.net
|
April 04, 2010
Dear ACitizen For your information I am a outsider looking in the little window observing your unusual ways of Goverment. Operator, Inspector kinda the same difference. Let's not make a Mountain out of a Mole Hill. Fact is this Mayor is gonna cost your city Millions, just like the UK Hoops Museum. May it rest in peace over One Million with it's doors closed. Such A tragedy.
ACitizen
|
April 01, 2010
Shell, Where's insider to let you know it's "operator" not "inspector." need to get more informed before you vote again, please, your community is depending on you. Or are you a mole or the recalist or those who live on the dole?
Shell68
|
March 31, 2010
Let Madame Mayor Pay the Fines. She should be held responsible for any wrong doings. After she fired the previous Level 4 Inspector.
ACitizen
|
March 31, 2010
1. This is a more sane, civil and professional approach by this state regulatory agency, the Ohio EPA, not the U S EPA, than before when they, Ohio EPA, seemed to have been agitated before and fired up by the reporting newspaper, the PDT's. Was it the reporting or the regulatory agency?

2. Perhaps they are back on their meds, both the Ohio EPA and the PDT's not joining in on the "Recallists."



3. What's that about out of calibration for a year, the mayor's only been there 3 months. ???



Ohio's reputation may come back state-wide. Perhaps? Henny Penny and the sky is falling must have been transferred in the interest of the Scioto County community. Perhaps the other rats nests that need attending to is a factor, maybe maybe not? Insider, got reassigned?
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: