Fatcow Icon
Union Speaks Out On City Budget Issue
by Frank Lewis
Mar 16, 2010 | 3289 views | 11 11 comments | 67 67 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Portsmouth Firefighters’ Association Local 512 is charging that Portsmouth Mayor Jane Murray is creating a “hostile work environment,” with a statement she made to the Portsmouth Daily Times in a story published in Sunday’s edition.

The reference was to the Mayor’s statement: “It doesn’t matter (to the employees) if we don’t have the money to pave the streets. It doesn’t matter to them if I don’t have the money to address our declining neighborhoods’ housing stock and clean the city up. It doesn’t matter to them that we have sewage backing up in people’s homes, and we have a long-term control plan that we have to start implementing.”

“This statement by the Mayor has created a hostile work environment and the fabrication of statements not made by the Portsmouth Firefighters Association is unacceptable,” Portsmouth Firefighter Chris Lowery, of the union’s executive board, said. “The Portsmouth Firefighters deeply care about the infrastructure, the safety and well-being of the citizens of the city. Historically, the Portsmouth Firefighters Assocation has demonstrated that we are willing to work with the city on financial matters. The Portsmouth Firefighters Association conducts numerous charitable events to help the citizens of the city of Portsmouth.”

In speaking to the issue of a hostile work environment, Clint Wallace, secretary of Local 512 said, “She’s putting words in our mouths that we are not saying. We are all proud to work here. We put our lives on the line for the citizens here, and for her to come out and say that we do not care about the city is a false statement. I take it personal. I don’t like it.”

In an interview with the Times, Murray said she has been having discussions with union employees. “I met with them on Friday, and it didn’t go well.”

That is not the same story being told by the members of the firefighters union.

“The Mayor of the city of Portsmouth has never asked the Portsmouth Firefighters Association Local 512 to meet with her in any setting to discuss city finances or any other issues,” Lowery said, reading from a prepared statement in the conference room of the Central Fire Station.

“Our union president, which is Tony Hamilton, has attempted to make appointments with her, and she has declined those. No meeting ever has been attempted from her. No attempt to meet with our union.”

Those city employees who did meet with Murray on Friday, according to Lowery, were there simply to listen to proposals concerning the city’s insurance.

Murray said she attempted to address the issue of having workers take furlough days as a way of bringing down the city’s ballooning budget deficit. Lowery addressed the issue.

“The city of Portsmouth Ordinance 1501.01 states that the city of Portsmouth has adopted and will comply with NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) standard 1710 for manpower, equipment, response times and safety. It states that each company shall be maintained with a minimum of four personnel on each fire department apparatus,” Lowery said. “Hilltop station and Sciotoville station each have two personnel stationed at all times for immediate response for life and property safety. Furloughs will potentially close down already-undermanned stations and endanger citizens’ lives and increase response times while compromising firefighter safety.”

Lowery was quoting from the NFPA 1710 standard Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. Section 5.2.3.1.1 states “these companies shall be staffed with a minimum of four on-duty personnel.”

Lowery produced a copy of the Codified Ordinances of Portsmouth. Ordinance 1501.1 says the city will be in “compliance with standards of the National Fire Protection Association or other approved nationally recognized standards shall be deemed to be prima-facie evidence of compliance with this intent.”

Murray said the public needs to know that in health insurance coverage alone, each employee pays $25 a month, and those on the family plan pay $50 a month, and that the family plan costs the city of Portsmouth more than $16,000 per year.

“Under our current contract signed by both the Portsmouth Firefighters Association and the city of Portsmouth, signed under good faith, each employee will pay $25 for a single plan and $50 for a family plan per month,” Lowery said. “In total, plus the deductible, each employee pays $860 single and $1,720 per family. The Mayor quoted over $16,000 per family plan; the actual amount is $15,746. That’s a difference of $254.”

Firefighters also took exception to the statement: “They have like six weeks of vacation. So when they take off two or three weeks at a time, then their overtime goes nuts, because they are all taking vacations.”

“Per article six of our current contract, a new employee receives six vacation days and the max that a firefighter may receive is 12 days. In addition, it states that scheduled vacation cannot cause overtime,” Lowery said.

He was also responding to Murray’s statement to department heads: “You are not to pay overtime to pay for this.”

The Fraternal Order of Police/Ohio Labor Council, Inc. also responded to the issues raised in Sunday’s Times article.

“The FOP is concerned with comments made by Mayor Murray indicating that she will implement furlough days for city employees. The City and the Fraternal Order of Police have a Collective Bargaining Agreement in place. The plan to force employees to take furlough days amounts to a change in the current terms and conditions of a negotiated contract. At no time has the Mayor requested a meeting to negotiate any changes nor has she presented any solid figures to show the need for concessions.”

In a release from Wes Elson, staff representative for the state FOP, the union officer said, “From accounts of those present, the Mayor became upset during the meeting, making the comment she would shut city government down and at one point directed the Police Administration to discipline an officer she perceived as being disrespectful when he referred to her as ma’am rather than Madam Mayor.”

In the news release Elson also said: “The FOP is very concerned that the City does not have a final budget in place, and that the question of how payroll will be met with no budget in place comes in question.

“Comments such as ‘because the employees were not willing to talk about contributing to the insurance fund, all I can do is add furlough days,’ and threats to discipline union representatives, is a poor way to ask for cooperation,” Elson said.



FRANK LEWIS can be reached at (740) 353-3101, ext. 232 or flewis@heartlandpublications.com
Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
akmjam2001
|
March 17, 2010
Acitizen says "drawing thoughs out who are responsible" our Fire an Police are not responsible for the condition that this city is in financialy.If Miss Murray knew what kind of trouble the city was in financialy why did she spend 17,000 on her office?Why did she try to give herself a raise? Why did she offer over 100,00 in jobs to her out of state buddies?Why did she transfer the insurance to someone that she knew?does she pay for her own insurance?It does not matter what good you think she is trying to do she is still lining the pockets of her own friends instead of the regulars that used to always get it.The city of portsmouth needs to look into a different health insurance plan because the amount that they are paying no matter how much the employee pays is to to much for the crappy coverage that they have.So instead of bashing the guys and gals that save lives why don't you look somewhere else to gripe for right now.
DeputyBill
|
March 17, 2010
You know there has to be a stopping point somewhere. I hate the word UNIONS. They were a good thing at one time. Let's face it 2 weeks vacation a year is plenty for anyone. 6 weeks? Come on. That is why steel mills and a lot of other run by union involment has cause a many a business to go under. AK steel, a woman who works there has earn 13 weeks vacation time. 3 months lost of one person work and paid to boot? The union came up with this crap years ago and got out of control.Empire steel workers needed and enjoyed the union and then it went over board. The union cost me my job in Portsmouth years ago and I am glad I never had to join another one since.
ACitizen
|
March 16, 2010
Buckeye3333 and Eldorango8, write a letter to the editor, please, the people deserve to know there's more than the wingnuts that speak out against the mayor cause they know she will clean it up. Please write, you can do it on here under "opinion" and click "Send a Letter to the Editor." Thanks for all you think and contribute.

The Mayor knows what she's doing transparency drawing out those responsible for where the city is fiscally and financially, bringing them out into the light, those fools, they've had it so good they don't get they can't get away with it anymore.

There has been more transparency in the last couple of months that you have not seen in decades. Run Murray Run.............
kong_45662
|
March 16, 2010
its funny that people gripe about insurance payments by the working, but no one gripes about welfare recipients that are fully capable of working yet doing nothing
GoVols!
|
March 16, 2010
Compromise folks! No one is completely right on every issue...keep in mind the BIG picture here. Mayor Murray is trying to get the city back on track and since the budget has been abused for many years, it has to go on a diet...and we all know how hard a diet is!She has taken on the difficult task of shaking things up for the good of the city. Who else would be up for the challenge?Keep her and all the gov't officials in our prayers and quit being so negative about everything. This area has a defeated spirit and we all need to press forward in God!
cityinsider
|
March 16, 2010
Does anybody know what a bouy is? PDT should not print comments from people who do not know how to spell or who sound like they are on drugs.

Get a dictionary, Doyle.
eldorango8
|
March 16, 2010
I think the mayor is doing a great job of TRYing to straighten out Portsmouth. Just kinda going about it the wrong way! Why should residents tax dollars pay for their insurance at an almost 95% of total cost!? so city workers are only paying for a litle over 5% OF THE TOTAL COST! come on? they could at least pay 10-20 percent! Oh and I've seen articles from this paper with pictures of cops so over weight I don't know how they would pass the physical requirements of new recruits! and we the public are suposed to pay 95% of their health insurance!

The ayor was agitated that the city workers that were there were not willing to compramise and lumped them all together in an agitated statement! awww.. some one got their feelings hurt in this time of lack of jobs, tight budgets for everyone, crime rate increasing! OH waahh I was in the millitary and served my country, suck it up and do your jobs and quit wineing!
buckeye3333
|
March 16, 2010
In this day and time people in this country are lucky to have a job. In Portsmouth you are lucky to even have a job when the economy is good in this country.

Its no wonder this city is broke. Unbelievable that a city employee only pays $25 a month for health Insurance, WoW !

Try paying $697 a month as I pay and I feel lucky that Insurance is even offered at this price. A neighbor pays $1,218 a month. At $25 a month it may as well be FREE for city employees !

Plus some people dont have the ability to see beyond whats in front of their eyes. This current Mayor did not create this deficit in the city budget. The last Mayor left this deficit and the people who sit on city council went along with this past Mayor.

Can we think back two Mayors ago, the one who was recalled and paid $8,000 to have murals painted on the side of Garbage Trucks.

Thats the kind of people who have ran this city in the past. Oh and just think how much more in debt we would be if they had got their Martings building. If they had been worried about balancing budgets instead of Martings Buildings, maybe we would not be in this situation.
JTB
|
March 16, 2010
Wow!!!! This is so embarrasing. Yet, comical at the same time. Who is the mayor going to attack next? The Portsmouth area homeless? The blind? This is all just so surreal!!!!
Dtownbrown
|
March 16, 2010
So once again, "Madam Mayor Murray" has been less than honest in her comments to the PDT. Why didn't the PDT verify the authenticity of her comments and include that information in the original story? If the firefighters and police had not chosen to refute her statements, would we, your loyal readers, have known the truth of the matter?
pepprdog
|
March 16, 2010
Our Mayor is totally out of control. She has no obvious leadership qualities and her creation of hostile environments at every city employee level is unbelievable. He lack of planning, lack of preparation, and lack of knowledge of contracts, lack of knowledge of ordinances, and lack of knowledge of the city charter show the lack of willingness to learn what is necessary to run her office. Her lack of cooperation with the people she is supposed to be working with is unprecedented.

I don't believe this is what the people of Portsmouth voted for.

Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: