Fatcow Icon
Marting’s deal dead; committee chair resigns
Feb 29, 2012 | 10892 views | 7 7 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print

By FRANK LEWIS

PDT Staff Writer

Four days after news broke of a potential buyer for the Marting’s building, that offer is off the table and the chairman of the city’s Building Committee has resigned.

Building Committee Chairman Alan G. Barlow delivered Wednesday to the Daily Times a printed copy of his resignation addressed to Portsmouth Mayor David Malone.

“In my opinion the Building Committee has been nothing but a sham and exists merely to give cover for certain elected officials and their plan to use the Marting’s building against the wishes of the public. I will not be part of these covert meetings activities that are clearly evident in emails between certain council members, Mayor Malone, and others.”

Soon after Barlow announced his resignation, Mistie Spicer, another member of the committee, resigned.

“It’s a conflict of interest with my job at the (WNXT) radio station,” Spicer said. “That’s why I resigned. I didn’t resign because of anything else. I didn’t realize the situation was going to get as controversial as it has gotten. And I should be covering it instead of serving on the committee.”

Earlier in the day, First Ward Councilman Kevin Johnson said he was asked by the unnamed non-profit organization once interested in the Marting’s building to announce that the proposal was off the table.

“What began as a very good opportunity for a number of organizations and our community has once again met the same demise many other things in our community have over the years,” Johnson wrote. “What is really sad is this might not have even made economic sense to pursue but we could never even get to the point of examining the project using real numbers to see if it was beneficial to all parties.”

In the same email, Johnson blames a “complete lack of leadership on the part of the City in setting the Building Committee’s agenda.” He said he acknowledges the proposal might not have worked out but said it was “shot down” before it even had a chance.

“The reality is there was never an offer made of anything other than to explore to see if this would work out. The organization was willing to give it a look and the Marting’s Foundation was willing to consider funding it,” Johnson wrote.

Johnson said he was asked by the unnamed organization to inform the city that their potential offer is “off the table” and, in his email, Johnson blamed a “relentless effort” by Barlow to reject the possibility and accused the media of “misdirection and misinformation.”

Johnson was likely referring to a Saturday report by the Daily Times that incorrectly quoted Malone as saying he offered the Marting’s building to the organization for $1. The Daily Times published a clarification the following day that the organization had instead offered to purchase the Marting’s building for $1.

Johnson wrote that the potential buyer “quite correctly perceived a political maelstrom” as an explanation why the organization backed out.

“I shall not ever reveal the name of the organization which may have been interested in pursuing this mutually beneficial potential and I shall have nothing further to say regarding the matter, save for the fact that I find it no wonder few if any businesses or organizations attempt to locate or invest in our City,” Johnson wrote.

The Portsmouth Daily Times submitted on Tuesday a records request to Portsmouth Mayor David Malone and City Councilmen Rich Saddler and Kevin Johnson. Malone shared numerous emails that show conversations about the potential sale were ongoing for five months without discussion in open City Council meetings or with public input.

The Times learned through documents it obtained that the local non-profit organization has the assets and ability to invest their own capital into the project, and only had need for a small amount of space in the building, “leaving ample room for the city to consolidate its offices in the building.” The description said the organization is “flexible” on the location of its space in the building; and would primarily be using the facilities during evening hours when the city offices will be closed, thus, not interfering with any parking for users of the city building during the day. “The organization would bring payroll to the city as well as people into town on a weekly basis spending money in our town.”

The same document listed the proposed financial structure of the transaction.

“The city would sell the property to the organization for $1. As a part of the transaction the organization would agree to remodel the property to accommodate the city’s needs.” The document said the organization would contribute up to $1 million of its own funds to the project, and the Marting’s Foundation could contribute up to $1.5 million to the project. “The city would enter into a lease agreement with the organization for the space the city will occupy,” and that the remaining cost of the project could be financed by the organization based upon the capital investment and the lease agreement with the city.” Up to $2.5 million in cash is available to put into the project up front.” Finally, the document says the city should then sell all of the vacant property that it owns in an effort to return it to productive use and to put it back onto the tax roll.

The Portsmouth Daily Times will trace a long series of emails, Committee meeting minutes and other correspondence in a timeline of events in Sunday’s edition.

Frank Lewis may be reached at 740-353-3101, ext. 232, or at flewis@heartlandpublications.com.



Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ILikeWine
|
March 01, 2012
I moved from Portsmouth 20 years ago. Loved the people but downtown Portsmouth needs to be bulldozed. Yes, it's historical but who really cares? Area people need jobs and downtown Portsmouth is dead.

We need a place like Easton or Polaris where there is plenty of parking, good places to eat, plenty of shopping and fun things to do instead of drugs.

Let's see...historical buildings or move forward with life? It's only my opinion so don't be offended.

PortsCitizen
|
March 01, 2012
In the last article written by the PDT, Mr. Johnson basically stated that in order for the Building Committee, rest of Council and the citizens to find out who this secretive buyer was that the committee would have to suggest the deal as a viable option. All before any real details were presented to the committee. If that isn't putting the wagon before the horse then I don't know what is. It sounds very much like what former Speaker Nancy Pelosi said when taking the vote on Obamacare, "We have to pass the bill before we find out what is in it". Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Mr. Johnson say in his campaign that government needed to be more transparent? 5 months of secretive emails, not mentioning the proposed sale terms and plans and especially not mentioning the interested group sure is far from being transparent. Since Mr. Johnson claims he knows who this mystery buyer is and clearly was the point man in the deal, and given the recent public spat between him and the mayor about supporting gay marriage rights, maybe the secret buyer was the Rainbow Coalition????
tellthetruthwontyou
|
March 01, 2012
"Johnson wrote, What is really sad is this might not have even made economic sense to pursue but we could never even get to the point of examining the project using real numbers to see if it was beneficial to all parties.”

No what is really sad is that the City of Portsmouth's City Council a few years ago, bought this building as an emergency major, without the city charters mandated 3 readings to let the taxpayers have a say and did it in secret and paid nearly 2 million dollars for this building and is now trying to sell it in secret for $1 dollar, and some city council people think this is the correct way to sell this building. Crazy!

Secondly, I applaud the Chairman of this building committee, as he says,

“In my opinion the Building Committee has been nothing but a sham and exists merely to give cover for certain elected officials and their plan to use the Marting’s building against the wishes of the public. I will not be part of these covert meetings activities that are clearly evident in emails between certain council members, Mayor Malone, and others.”

Its good that someone in this city has some sense. I dont know who this gentleman is, but he obviously thanks like the majority of the citizens of Portsmouth and dont want to be part of another behind closed doors, as happened when this building was purchased !



Plus the last article on this building the 6th Ward Councilmen said the building should be torn down and used for a parking lot. What ? Tear down a building that the taxpayers paid nearly 2 million dollars for, without trying to sell it, rent it, market it. There are parking lots all over downtown sitting empty. Plus that will look real nice with a big hole in the middle of downtown with an empty space. Downtown's are not supposed to have parking inbetween buildings, its supposed to be on the street or behind buildings. Buildings are supposed to be side by side as they are now.

"Malone shared numerous emails that show conversations about the potential sale were ongoing for five months without discussion in open City Council meetings or with public input."

This is totally unbelievable ! The citizens were screwed when this building was purchased in secret, now the leader of the city is trying to sell it in secret! Dont the people of this city government have a brain or a clue ? With all the problems this city government has with trust, and then try to do this all for 5 months in secret ? Wow !

One day they are arguing about who gives support or dont give support on gay issues and religious views, then a few days later they are agreeing to sell $2 million dollar buildings for $1 in secrecy, without any input from the taxpayer, who contiually gets screwed. Thats why no one locates in this city.

Its a bunch of people running the show who have no idea how to participate in financial affairs, government or common sense.

PortsCitizen
|
February 29, 2012
PDT Publisher (Mr. Messerly), based on past history expect a visit from the Chamber of Commerce and other Portsmouth power-brokers threatening to pull their advertising from your newspaper. The PDT and a couple of their reporters have attempted to report on similar things in the past and all have been fired.

It's up to you sir, will you have the courage to stand up to them or give into the pressure. I kindly remind you sir of the reasons why our founding fathers were sure to not restrict the press. You were given such as a part of a system of checks and balances of government. "The Watchdog of Goverment Misdoings"

Praises to Mr. Barlow and Ms. Spicer for having the courage to call it as it appears to have been. I expect others will follow.

Shame on you Mr. Johnson for trying to orchastrate yet another behind closed door deal over the Marting's building. In case you suffer from memory loss, you should have already known ANY backroom deal involving the Marting's building would be DOA. The people have already spoke twice against the use of the Marting's building. One key reason why the citizens are against the building is as a result of how originally it was as a result of backroom deals. Not to mention the inflated price of almost 2 Million dollars.
fatwhiteman
|
February 29, 2012
How much to rent a wrecking crane and bulldozer? That building would look good as a park. No one is ever going to be happy otherwise.
mebcrazymike@roadrunner.com
|
February 29, 2012
The Marting Building Joke: What a "bunch of Clowns" we have at City Hall. Especially Kevin Johnson.
Timpayne
|
March 06, 2012
When will the truth in info act force them to tell who the non profit was? How are they able to hide it. MAY I remind you people of Portsmouth YOU voted these clowns in. Please vote them out! No I don't live in City limits but their decisions reflect on all of us
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: