Fatcow Icon
Consolidation unpopular to politicians but worth consideration
by Kevin Johnson
Feb 22, 2011 | 3412 views | 2 2 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I have read Portsmouth Health Commissioner Peggy Burton's two recent letters published in the Portsmouth Daily Times ("Talk of health department consolidation is troubling" on Feb. 19, and "City would lose if health departments consolidated" on Feb. 22 paper) with interest.

 Let me state that there are two distinct issues at play, which she has combined to one.

 The first is our budget. Councilman and acting President of Council John Haas is correct, in my mind, at questioning any spending by the City. We are fast becoming broke and it is, in my mind, doubtful that the income tax increase on the May ballot will pass. Should this income tax proposal be defeated, we are in deep trouble. Thus, any questioning of budgets and means to cut our expenditures is appropriate.

 That being said, I would not care to cut the Health Department budget and its needed services unless all other departments, especially our largest, are cut equivalently. That won't happen, unfortunately. Our labor contracts limit our management abilities. Though I do not support SB/HB 5, due to  it being massive  overkill, its passage would certainly change  our budget equation.

 The second is the issue of consolidation. Let's be frank. Absolutely no governmental entity in Scioto County wants to consider consolidation, for political and control purposes, in my estimation. As we heard during our budget discussions, neither the County nor New Boston will even discuss consolidating emergency dispatch services, although it makes absolutely good sense in a county of but some 70,000 people to do so.

Additionally, none of  our 10 school districts (with but 12,554 students total; an average of 1,255 each) or the 16 townships (with a population, in 2000, of 55,946, averaging 3,497) will consider consolidation. It is a matter of politics and control; each school district and township with their own elected officials (and costs associated thereto), various executive staffing and each with its own hand in the property tax cookie jar.  The same holds true, I believe, for  our health departments with their independent boards and bureaucracies.

 As much as I support (and have applauded)  the efforts and services of our Health Department, I am concerned that anyone from our Health Department  would state that these services could not be provided by a combined department; such, in my mind,  being  strictly a political statement  and simply reflecting the attitudes of those who wield control of our local health systems. There are county health departments that do indeed provide such services you note in your letters. And any negotiation regarding consolidation could certainly include the services of all three  health departments. (I include the TB Clinic due to its property  tax assessment of 0.5 mills.)

 The Portsmouth Daily Times recently interviewed Fire Chief Bill Raison. Though I have disagreement on one particular point (the Charter provisions), I applaud his statement concerning risk analysis. We, the City and its taxpayers, have to determine what and how much we can afford. Can we continue to  afford a state-of-the-art and Charter-required staffing for our fire and police departments as well as the demands of various other important departments? Can we afford to continue the status quo given the tremendously increased costs but static and in some cases declining  income? And, finally, can we afford to continue as we have in the past — that is, collecting property and income  taxes to maintain the innumerable numbers of independent government entities that should, by all logic and reason, be combined or consolidated in order to lower the real unit cost of providing services while maintaining and possibly increasing the quality of such services?

 I have lived, in a combined city/county (San Francisco) and in Contra Costa County — one of the largest counties  in California with some  1.064 million people. Both have combined health departments and provide far more services than are available anywhere in Scioto County; at a cost, certainly, but one that they, taxpayers and governments, by  a continuing risk-analysis  determined  is needed and wanted.

 Consolidation  can  and should be  done; and not only for our health departments.

Kevin Johnson

City of Portsmouth First Ward Councilman
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ACitizen
|
February 28, 2011
Mr. Jeff,

Johnson is our councilperson in Ward 1, what are you doing in Ward 6 to replace Noel? Anything?

A write in this month would have prompted a run off in the Primaries too too late now.

You can still put a write-in in by August 10th. for the General Elecdtion which Skiver did and came in Second. Put a couple of write in's in and you could have a winner to back up Johnson or else he's out there all alone. I think he would like backup not verbal alcolades, etc.

A Write-in only requires less then a page application, less than a page, no petitions, etc. What's you ggoing to do about it, don't know anybody out there?

Leedon know's no one in Ward 2, and could be a write in too but what's he going to do, research and billowing, etc.

JeffDempsey
|
February 27, 2011
Exactly! Thank you Councilman Johnson for saying exactly what needed to be said.

Councilman Kevin Johnson is far superior in mind-set, with political views that are still in line with principles and concerns of the citizens of Portsmouth.

This man is clearly - the best government official, department head, employee or mayor that could be! That we currently have involved! We need 5 more just like him on city council with Councilman Noel now not running!

Great job, Councilman Johnson!
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: