Fatcow Icon
Council votes to support collective bargaining
by Frank Lewis
Mar 02, 2011 | 2545 views | 3 3 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Even though all members of Portsmouth City Council openly favored a resolution supporting collective bargaining and prevailing wage laws, a long discussion ensued at Monday night’s meeting.

Council President John Haas had given the resolution to Portsmouth City Solicitor Mike Jones, who assembled the components and it was presented by Third Ward Councilman Nick Basham at the last minute.

First Ward Councilman said he could not support the council’s legislation since Monday’s resolution was referred to as opposing Senate Bill 5, but also covered prevailing wage, which he said is not covered in SB 5.

“I have already written to Sen. (Tom) Niehaus and (State Rep. Terry) Johnson, expressing my position on SB 5,” Johnson said. “However, this doesn’t really address SB 5. It addresses portions of SB 5. The way this is written is an all or nothing proposition, and let’s face political facts, that ain’t happening. This does not reflect good faith negotiations. That is what the unions have been stressing all along, that they have been trying to negotiate with our government and governor in good faith, and that part has been rejected.”

He said that according to Niehaus there are negotiations underway to significantly change what Johnson referred to as an “anti-union” bill.

“But I would have much preferred us to have an opportunity to look at this,” Johnson said. “Not to necessarily weaken it but to recognize that this is the new reality existing politically and economically in the state of Ohio — not only our state and other states.”

Haas then read all seven sections of the resolution to clarify the purpose of the document. He mentioned that the resolution also covers something the city passed last year dealing with community workforce agreements.

Two amendments were proposed, including adding the statement, “And hereby specifically oppose Senate Bill 5,” to Section 4, which was eventually adopted, and to remove the section dealing with the Ohio School Facilities Commission, which Johnson said is a totally separate issue from Senate Bill 5.

“This document here is really not about Senate Bill 5 the way I read it,” Second Ward Councilman Rich Saddler said. “It is something saying that the City of Portsmouth recognizes collective bargaining and minimum wage laws.”

Saddler said he did not believe that anything needed to be removed from the original wording of the bill.

“I regret that we cannot come to a consensus on this,” Johnson said. “If it hadn’t been about SB 5, which is the issue before the Legislature, not the Ohio Schools Facilities Commission. I regret that this cannot be a unanimous vote.”

Johnson withdrew his request for an amendment, and in the end the vote was 5-1 with Johnson’s the lone no vote.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
easterling
|
March 02, 2011
And while the Unions protest and whine, and city councils dabble in resolutions that do not mean squat, jobs are still moving to Tennessee, South Carolina, Arkansas, Mississippi, not to mention Latin America, China, Korea, etc.

Keep fiddling while the city burns, soon you won't have to worry about the mold and asbestos.
ACitizen
|
March 02, 2011
Here's Dah Bouys playing government again?

Basham is the new Albrecht with the emergancy, wham bam thank you mame illegal ordinances, etc.

This union thing is nation-wide and Rasich will follow his Cult the GOP and vaporize your city employees' Unions and votes, city council.

"Something Saying" Good job Saddler II.

We have moved from the 4 to 2 SOGP majority to the 5 to 1 Majority, another giant step backward for mankind in Scioto County.

Again, get with it Bouys, Kasich will smash your votes from the City Employees, no more unions, you will have to get creative at your excuses on why you give the farm to the city employees, etc.

Sorry for you bad luck, Bouys.

emporiums
|
March 02, 2011
I remain concerned at City Council passing a resolution to include actions by the Ohio School Facilities Commission; an issue that affects not the City of Portsmouth but the school districts of our area - which are divided about this subject. This is akin to these school boards passing resolutions City of Portsmouth issues, such as our income tax increase proposal or where to site a new city hall should be ever get to that point. We on Council know absolutely nothing about the ramifications of changes made by the Ohio School Facilities Commission. Our voice could have been made stronger by our having simply focused upon SB5. Unfortunately, there was much more going on in this resolution for which we had 90 minutes to review (that is, we COULD have reviewed it if we had ignored all other Council business in order to read this last minute addition to the Council agenda).
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: